ArticleAtherosclerosis plus2024
Associations of very low Lipoprotein(a) levels with risks of new-onset diabetes and non-alcoholic liver disease.
Article in Atherosclerosis plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Roles of Lipoprotein(a) in Atherosclerosis - Minding the Knowledge Gaps.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Drug targets for lipid modification and risk of type 2 diabetes: a cis-Mendelian randomization study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- The Lipoprotein(a) Implementation Gap: Bridging Evidence and Clinical Practice.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Lipoprotein (a) levels and clinical decision-making: data from a Mexican cohort at a tertiary medical institution.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Article
- Promising results with the daily oral small molecule lipoprotein(a) inhibitor, muvalaplin, in high-risk cardiovascular patients with elevated lipoprotein(a) levels.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Apolipoprotein B and Glycemic Dysregulation: New Predictors of Type 2 Diabetes in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Populations.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- 2024: The year in cardiovascular disease - the year of lipoprotein(a). Research advances and new findings.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2025Article
- Lipoprotein(a) and cardiovascular disease.The Biochemical journal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: We aimed to study the association of very low serum Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations with new-onset type 2 diabetes (T2D) and non-alcoholic liver disease (NAFLD) in the context of statin usage in the UK Biobank, a large prospective population cohort. Methods: Using an extended biomarker dataset, we identified 47,362 participants with very low Lp(a) concentrations (<3.8 nmol/L) from a total of 451,479 participants. With a median follow-up of 12.3 years, we assessed the risk of new-onset cardiometabolic diseases in participants stratified by statin usage with Cox proportional hazards models. We performed two-sample Mendelian randomization MR analyses to test causal relationship between genetically predicted Lp(a) and T2D and NAFLD. Results: Taking the participants with Lp(a) within reportable range as the reference group, the hazard ratios (HR) for T2D were 1.07 (95 % confidence interval, CI 1.01-1.13) and for NAFLD 1.30 (95 % CI 1.20-1.41) respectively for participants with very low Lp(a) (<3.8 nmol/L). The risk for new-onset T2D was higher in participants using statins (adjusted HR 1.15; 95 % CI 1.05-1.27). The risk estimates for new-onset NAFLD were comparable in the analysis stratified by statin use. There was no evidence for causal links between genetically predicted Lp(a) and T2D nor NAFLD in two-sample MR analyses. Conclusions: Very low Lp(a) was associated with higher risks of T2D and NAFLD in a prospective analysis of the UK Biobank. The association with T2D was influenced by lipid lowering medication usage. MR analyses did not support causality for these inverse associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.