ArticleJournal of bone oncology2024
Real-world experiences in patients with Ewing sarcoma treated at a specialist centre in Turkey.
Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic impact of tumor-associated macrophages in pediatric Ewing sarcoma, National Cancer Institute (2010-2020).World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Targeting glycerophospholipid biosynthesis overcomes chemoresistance driven by SLFN11 loss in Ewing sarcoma.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The present study evaluates the clinical outcomes of children, adolescents and adults with Ewing sarcoma and identifies the prognostic factors. Methods: Included in the study were 222 pediatric and adult patients diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma (EwS) who were followed up between 1992 and 2019, and whose data were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The median age of 131 male and 91 female patients included in the study was 13 (1-64). The median follow-up duration of the survivors was 79 months (range, 11-182 months). The 3-year EFS rate of the 222 patients was 34 % (Confidence Interval (CI) (0.158-0.242 %) and the OS rate was 54 % (CI, 0.289-0.590 %). For the non-metastatic patients, the 3-year EFS rate was 47 % and the OS was 68 %, while for the metastatic patients the 3-year EFS rate was 13 % and the OS was 30 %. Of the patient sample, 81 (36, 5 %) survived, of whom 72 were continuously free of disease while the disease persisted in nine, and three developed a secondary neoplasm (2 of whom subsequently died while one survived disease-free). Of the 129 patients who relapsed with metastases and/or local recurrence, eight survived and are disease-free, nine are alive with uncontrolled disease; five were lost to follow-up and 107 died. Conclusion: The findings of the present study suggest metastatic disease at presentation and positive margins after surgery to be of prognostic significance in EwS. Disruptions in aggressive local treatments may reduce the chances of cure in EwS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.