ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
A robust ensemble deep learning framework for accurate diagnoses of tuberculosis from chest radiographs.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An ensemble model approach for identifying pulmonary tuberculosis on chest X-ray.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) stands as a paramount global health concern, contributing significantly to worldwide mortality rates. Effective containment of TB requires deployment of cost-efficient screening method with limited resources. To enhance the precision of resource allocation in the global fight against TB, this research proposed chest X-ray radiography (CXR) based machine learning screening algorithms with optimization, benchmarking and tuning for the best TB subclassification tasks for clinical application. Methods: This investigation delves into the development and evaluation of a robust ensemble deep learning framework, comprising 43 distinct models, tailored for the identification of active TB cases and the categorization of their clinical subtypes. The proposed framework is essentially an ensemble model with multiple feature extractors and one of three fusion strategies-voting, attention-based, or concatenation methods-in the fusion stage before a final classification. The comprised de-identified dataset contains records of 915 active TB patients alongside 1,276 healthy controls with subtype-specific information. Thus, the realizations of our framework are capable for diagnosis with subclass identification. The subclass tags include: secondary tuberculosis/tuberculous pleurisy; non-cavity/cavity; secondary tuberculosis only/secondary tuberculosis and tuberculous pleurisy; tuberculous pleurisy only/secondary tuberculosis and tuberculous pleurisy. Results: Based on the dataset and model selection and tuning, ensemble models show their capability with self-correction capability of subclass identification with rendering robust clinical predictions. The best double-CNN-extractor model with concatenation/attention fusion strategies may potentially be the successful model for subclass tasks in real application. With visualization techniques, in-depth analysis of the ensemble model's performance across different fusion strategies are verified. Discussion: The findings underscore the potential of such ensemble approaches in augmenting TB diagnostics with subclassification. Even with limited dataset, the self-correction within the ensemble models still guarantees the accuracies to some level for potential clinical decision-making processes in TB management. Ultimately, this study shows a direction for better TB screening in the future TB response strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.