ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2024
Identification of Challenging Diagnostic Factors in Livedoid Vasculopathy: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular insights from skin biopsies: Deciphering microvascular pathology in peripheral vascular diseases.World journal of experimental medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Livedoid vasculopathy is an uncommon cutaneous ulcerative dermatosis that is challenging to diagnose. Diagnostic delay brought both pain and uncurable atrophied scar to patients. Purpose: We conducted this study to identify the factors responsible for the initial misdiagnosis of livedoid vasculopathy and to identify possible methods to increase the diagnostic accuracy of livedoid vasculopathy. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective medical record review to confirm the diagnosis of livedoid vasculopathy in patients who visited the Department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital for the first time. We used the Diagnosis Error Evaluation and Research taxonomy to evaluate missed cases. Results: Twenty-three patients (85.18%) had an alternate diagnosis, including 10 (43.4%) with two or more diagnoses. The average time from disease onset to the final diagnosis of livedoid vasculopathy was 4.61 ± 0.69 years. The major diagnostic errors were clinician assessment failures and failures in the timely follow-up and rechecking of patients. Allergic vasculitis was the most common misdiagnosis. Other alternate diagnoses include Henoch-Schoenlein purpura, pigmented purpuric dermatosis, eczema, erythema nodosum, and reactive perforating collagenases. Twenty-three patients (65.21%) received systemic corticosteroid therapy before the final diagnosis of livedoid vasculopathy. Conclusion: It is critical to raise the awareness of clinicians about livedoid vasculopathy, especially when patient present with extensive livedo racemosa or long-lasting purpuric lesions on the lower limbs. Long-term follow-up is necessary, especially for younger patients. Skin biopsy is recommended before systematic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.