ReviewFrontiers in public health2024
A mentally healthy framework to guide employers and policy makers.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness and Feasibility of Workplace-Based Mental Health Interventions for University Academic Staff: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Pooled it
- Establishing Key Domains for Measuring Workplace Mental Health: The Indicators of A Thriving Workplace Survey.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Psychosocial Workplace Environments Enabling Sustainable Employment for People with Mental Health Conditions: A Scoping Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Review
- Mental Ill health and burnout in residential aged care workers.Npj mental health research · 2026Article
- Cross-cultural impact of information anxiety on employee mental health in digital workplaces: a comparative study between Chinese and Western contexts.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- When resilience backfires: the counterintuitive effect of employee resilience in high-tech surveillance environments.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Article
- Validation of the third version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire for Portugal.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Identifying modifiable causes of stress in clinicians and administrators working in New South Wales psychiatric emergency care centres, 2023-24: a qualitative study.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025Article
- 'From that time onwards my role changed'. Disclosing suicidality in Australian workplaces a qualitative study.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- Can an organizationally anchored, multilevel intervention improve perceived stress and psychosocial factors in the workplace? A pre-post study assessing effectiveness and implementation.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Beyond image: evaluating the perceived effectiveness of workplace mental health programs in the insurance sector.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Mental health at work: a practical framework for employers.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health problems among the working population represent a growing concern with huge impacts on individuals, organizations, compensation authorities, and social welfare systems. The workplace presents both psychosocial risks and unique opportunities for intervention. Although there has been rapid expansion of workplace mental health interventions over recent decades, clear direction around appropriate, evidence-based action remains limited. While numerous workplace mental health models have been proposed to guide intervention, general models often fail to adequately consider both the evidence base and where best-practice principles alone inform action. Further, recommendations need to be updated as new discoveries occur. We seek to update the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.