Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39109004›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2024

Monodermal teratoma: Three case reports and review of literature.

Ling-Yu He, Wei Li

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ling-Yu HeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.
Wei LiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of monodermal teratomas of the reproductive system is low, and most doctors lack adequate understanding, which can easily lead to missed diagnoses and/or misdiagnosis. Therefore, it is important to fully understand the clinical characteristics, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and treatment of monodermal teratomas of the reproductive system. CASE SUMMARY: Case 1: A 14-year-old boy was admitted to the hospital with a right testicular mass for 1 wk and underwent surgical resection. He was finally diagnosed with right testicular monodermal teratoma with no special postoperative discomfort. Case 2: A 40-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital for uterine abnormalities indicated by ultrasound 20 d prior and underwent laparoscopic surgery. She was finally diagnosed with a left ovarian monodermal teratoma with a satisfactory postoperative quality of life. Case 3: A 49-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital with a pelvic mass that was discovered on B-ultrasound a week prior and underwent laparoscopic resection of the left adnexa. She was finally diagnosed with left ovarian monodermal teratoma, and her postoperative quality of life was satisfactory.

conclusionMonodermal teratoma is a rare tumor whose clinical manifestations are primarily benign. Simple surgical resection of the tumor is effective.

Indexed as

Case reportOvaryReproductionTeratomaTestis

Identifiers

PMID39109004
PMCPMC11238806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.