Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39108941›Full record

ArticleMass spectrometry (Tokyo, Japan)2024

Rapid Analysis of Glucosinolates Using Direct-Infusion Mass Spectrometry.

Miho Tanewata, Akira Oikawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mass spectrometry (Tokyo, Japan), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Miho TanewataGraduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawaoiwake-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan.
Akira OikawaGraduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawaoiwake-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a rapid, accurate, and quantitative method for analyzing glucosinolates (GSLs) by combining column-free liquid chromatography (LC) with direct-infusion mass spectrometry (MS). Conventional methods for analyzing GSLs take a long time (20-50 min per sample) to perform compound separation on an LC column. We achieved a shortened analysis time of 30 seconds per sample using a direct-infusion method. Samples were continuously injected by a pump and autosampler on an LC system directly into the MS. Orbitrap MS detected 11 types of GSLs in the extracts of turnip hypocotyls. The calibration curve of a GSL standard showed a linear response over a 6-digit concentration range from 1 nM to 1 mM. In addition, no decrease in the detected intensity of GSL ions in 100 continuous analyses of turnip extracts was observed. This method may be applied for rapid analysis of GSLs and other health-functional or bioactive compounds.

Indexed as

orbitrap MSsolid phase extractionturnip

Identifiers

PMID39108941
PMCPMC11302999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.