ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024
Single and Combined Serum Proteins Expressed in TB Infection are Candidates for Point-of-care Diagnostic Testing of Active TB Patients in Lambaréné, Gabon.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Point-of-care testing using nonsputum samples like serum or plasma proteins can improve tuberculosis (TB) patients access to a definitive diagnosis, especially in resource-constrained and remote areas. Recently, approximately 400 proteins were identified as playing a role in the pathogenesis of TB, offering a translational clinical research repository for TB. In a previous manuscript, we proved the potential use of these proteins for point-of-care testing for active TB diagnosis. The present work aims to confirm the performance of single and combination proteins to select the best candidate biomarkers for further development as a diagnostic testing tool for active TB. Methods: Seventy-four participants were assessed on the diagnostic performance of 17 single proteins and combinations of 2 to 4 proteins to diagnose active TB. The selection criteria included differential expression of the proteins between active TB and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and a performance rate ≥70% for active TB. Results: SULT4A1, WASPF3, SPTLC1, FAM107B, SORCS2, and CYTOb561 were differentially expressed in TB compared to CAP patients. Two single proteins, SULT4A1 and WASPF3, performed ≥70% to discriminate active TB from CAP patients. The diagnostic performance of 3 protein-based combinations of active TB was 81% after leave-one-out cross-validation. Conclusion: Single proteins and 3 protein-based combinations are candidate biomarkers for diagnosing active TB disease. A large and prospective study will confirm their performance as complementary diagnostic tools to rapid diagnostic methods for detecting active TB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.