ArticleHeliyon2024
Enhanced power grid performance through Gorilla Troops Algorithm-guided thyristor controlled series capacitors allocation.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article introduces an innovative application of the Enhanced Gorilla Troops Algorithm (EGTA) in addressing engineering challenges related to the allocation of Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitors (TCSC) in power grids. Drawing inspiration from gorilla group behaviors, EGTA incorporates various methods, such as relocation to new areas, movement towards other gorillas, migration to specific locations, following the silverback, and engaging in competitive interactions for adult females. Enhancements to EGTA involve support for the exploitation and the exploration, respectively, through two additional strategies of periodic Tangent Flight Operator (TFO), and Fitness-based Crossover Strategy (FCS). The paper initially evaluates the effectiveness of EGTA by comparing it to the original GTA using numerical CEC 2017 single-objective benchmarks. Additionally, various recent optimizers are scrutinized. Subsequently, the suitability of the proposed EGTA for the allocation of TCSC apparatuses in transmission power systems is assessed through simulations on two IEEE power grids of 30 and 57 buses, employing various TCSC apparatus quantities. A comprehensive comparison is conducted between EGTA, GTA, and several other prevalent techniques in the literature for all applications. According to the average attained losses, the presented EGTA displays notable reductions in power losses for both the first and second systems when compared to the original GTA. Specifically, for the first system, the proposed EGTA achieves reductions of 1.659 %, 2.545 %, and 4.6 % when optimizing one, two, and three TCSC apparatuses, respectively. Similarly, in the second system, the suggested EGTA achieves reductions of 6.096 %, 7.107 %, and 4.62 %, respectively, when compared to the original GTA's findings considering one, two, and three TCSC apparatuses. The findings underscore the superior effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed EGTA over both the original GTA and several other contemporary systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.