ArticleHeliyon2024
Computational modeling of maxillary canine orthodontic movement.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stress distribution during orthodontic maxillary canine retraction using 3D finite element analysis.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The current study aims to explore the stress distribution along the roots of palatally positioned maxillary canines during orthodontic movement using a novel computational spring model. Methods: An experimental analysis based on the spring-model was utilized to calculate Orthodontic Tooth Movement (OTM) and the resulting stresses. Two sets of experiments were conducted: the first set compared stresses on a canine resulting from a single force and a force-couple, while the second set simulated canines' traction during instantaneous movement with varying original tooth angulations using different off-the-shelf orthodontic coils. In total, 130 simulations were performed. Results: The model provided estimated stress distribution throughout the OTM with the expected movements, producing consistent outcomes with prior findings. In the first set of experiments, the force couple exhibited an average stress of 43 KPa, while a single force yielded 51 KPa on average. The maximum stress observed was 63 KPa for the force couple and 130 KPa for a single force. Note that the stress distribution attributed to the force couple was alleviated in comparison to the stress distribution caused by a single force. Force couples generated higher average stress. In the second experiment, the application of an occlusally-directed inclined force led to reduced stress levels overall. For instance, when a 200 g distal force was exerted on the canine, it generated an average stress of 20 KPa, whereas applying a force of the same magnitude in an occlusal-distal direction resulted in a lower average stress of 15.5 KPa. Conclusions: Lower average stress levels when using a force couple indicate that larger loads might be safely applied for rotational movements. Given that areas under maximal stress are prone to damage, orthodontic treatment planning should carefully consider stress distribution to minimize potential harm in these high-stress zones. The results also suggest that force couples enable the use of stronger forces than a single force. Additionally, it is advisable to extrude the tooth initially before starting any horizontal movement towards the target position. Clinical significance: Given that orthodontic treatment often relies on virtual planning, incorporating a variety of methods to evaluate stress distribution within the treatment strategy could offer numerous benefits. Such an approach holds the potential to improve both the efficiency and safety of orthodontic treatments, especially in complex cases that require the application of high forces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.