Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39108817›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied crystallography2024

Quantitative selection of sample structures in small-angle scattering using Bayesian methods.

Yui Hayashi, Shun Katakami, Shigeo Kuwamoto, Kenji Nagata, Masaichiro Mizumaki, Masato Okada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied crystallography, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yui HayashiGraduate School of Frontier Sciences University of Tokyo Kashiwa Chiba277-8561 Japan.
Shun KatakamiGraduate School of Frontier Sciences University of Tokyo Kashiwa Chiba277-8561 Japan.
Shigeo KuwamotoJapan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute Sayo Hyogo679-5198 Japan.
Kenji NagataNational Institute for Materials Science Tsukuba Ibaraki305-0047 Japan.
Masaichiro MizumakiFacalty of Advanced Science and Technology Kumamoto University Kumamoto860-8555 Japan.
Masato OkadaGraduate School of Frontier Sciences University of Tokyo Kashiwa Chiba277-8561 Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small-angle scattering (SAS) is a key experimental technique for analyzing nanoscale structures in various materials. In SAS data analysis, selecting an appropriate mathematical model for the scattering intensity is critical, as it generates a hypothesis of the structure of the experimental sample. Traditional model selection methods either rely on qualitative approaches or are prone to overfitting. This paper introduces an analytical method that applies Bayesian model selection to SAS measurement data, enabling a quantitative evaluation of the validity of mathematical models. The performance of the method is assessed through numerical experiments using artificial data for multicomponent spherical materials, demonstrating that this proposed analysis approach yields highly accurate and interpretable results. The ability of the method to analyze a range of mixing ratios and particle size ratios for mixed components is also discussed, along with its precision in model evaluation by the degree of fitting. The proposed method effectively facilitates quantitative analysis of nanoscale sample structures in SAS, which has traditionally been challenging, and is expected to contribute significantly to advancements in a wide range of fields.

Indexed as

Bayesian inferencemodel selectionnanostructure analysissmall-angle neutron scatteringsmall-angle X-ray scattering

Identifiers

PMID39108817
PMCPMC11299617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.