Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39108794›Full record

ArticleJournal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures)2024

Simplified Diagnosis of Urosepsis by Emergency Ultrasound Combined with Clinical Scores and Biomarkers.

Alice Nicoleta Dragoescu, Petru Octavian Dragoescu, Andreea Doriana Stanculescu, Vlad Padureanu, Dalia Dop, Mihai Alexandru Radu, Mirela Marinela Florescu, Daniela Teodora Maria, Dan Nicolae Florescu, George Mitroi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent advances in early screening and diagnosis of sepsis: a narrative review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alice Nicoleta DragoescuFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Petru Octavian DragoescuFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Andreea Doriana StanculescuFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Vlad PadureanuFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Dalia DopFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Mihai Alexandru RaduFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Mirela Marinela FlorescuFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Daniela Teodora MariaFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Dan Nicolae FlorescuFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
George MitroiFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Urosepsis is a life-threatening medical condition due to a systemic infection that originates in the urinary tract. Early diagnosis and treatment of urosepsis are critical to reducing mortality rates and preventing complications. Our study was aimed at identifying a fast and reliable method for early urosepsis diagnosis and severity assessment by combining prognostic scores such as SOFA and NEWS with ultrasound examination and serum markers PCT and NLR. Methods: We performed a single-center prospective observational study in the Craiova Clinical Emergency Hospital. It initially analysed 204 patients admitted for sepsis of various origins in our hospital between June and October 2023. Those with urological conditions that were suspected to have urosepsis have been selected for the study so that finally 76 patients were included as follows: the severe cases with persistent hypotension requiring vasopressor were enrolled in the septic shock group (15 patients - 19.7%), while the rest were included in the sepsis group (61 patients - 80.3%). Mortality rate in our study was 10.5% (8/76 deaths due to sepsis). Results: Both prognostic scores SOFA and NEWS were significantly elevated in the septic shock group, as were the sepsis markers PCT and NLR. We identified a strong significant positive correlation between the NEWS and SOFA scores (r = 0.793) as well as PCT and NLR (r=0.417). Ultrasound emergency evaluation proved to be similar to CT scan in the diagnosis of urosepsis (RR = 0.944, p=0.264). ROC analysis showed similar diagnostic performance for both scores (AUC = 0.874 for SOFA and 0.791 for NEWS), PCT and NLR (AUC = 0.743 and 0.717). Conclusion: Our results indicate that an accurate and fast diagnosis of urosepsis and its severity may be accomplished by combining the use of simpler tools like emergency ultrasound, the NEWS score and NLR which provide a similar diagnosis performance as other more complex evaluations.

Indexed as

neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioNEWSprocalcitoninSOFAultrasoundurosepsis

Identifiers

PMID39108794
PMCPMC11193979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.