SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2024
NMDA antagonist agents for the treatment of symptoms in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glycine-modulating Slc6a20a-ASO restores NMDA receptor function in SHANK2 and SHANK3-mutant mice and cortical organoids.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Longitudinal metabolome profiling from pregnancy through childhood and risk of neurodevelopmental disorders at age 10.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Novel therapeutics in autism spectrum disorder.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Review
- Pharmacological Interventions in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Comprehensive Review of Mechanisms and Efficacy.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Stem cell therapy for the treatment of psychiatric disorders: a real hope for the next decades.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Review
- Lessons Learned from Drug Development Programs in Autism: Implications for Future Programs.Innovations in clinical neuroscienceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of NMDA antagonists in ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) on the core (communication and social interaction, repetitive behavior) and associated symptoms (irritability) of ASD, as well as their safety. Methods: PubMed, CENTRAL, CINHAL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases were searched until November 2023. Two authors independently selected the studies and extracted data. Randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of NMDA receptor antagonists in participants with ASD aged <18 years were included. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Risk of Bias-2 tool. A random-effect meta-analysis model was used to calculate standardized mean differences (SMD) or odds ratios (OR) using meta package in R. Results: This systematic review included ten studies (588 participants). Most studies did not report scales assessing core symptoms of ASD. Meta-analysis of efficacy on ASD core symptoms included three studies (248 participants). NMDA antagonists were not superior to placebo [SMD = 0.29; CI 95% (-1,94; 1.35); I Conclusion: Current evidence does not support the effectiveness of NMDA antagonists in the treatment of ASD symptoms or irritability. Further research is needed due to the limited and low quality data available. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42018110399.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.