ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
G-
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- KG-DFI: A Prediction of Drug-Food Interactions Based on Knowledge Graph Embedding.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Structure-Aware Compound-Protein Affinity Prediction via Graph Neural Networks with Group Lasso Regularization.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Expediting hit-to-lead progression in drug discovery through reaction prediction and multi-dimensional optimization.Nature communications · 2025Article
- QSAR and machine learning methods for prediction of albumin-ligand binding.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- Prospective de novo drug design with deep interactome learning.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein-ligand interactions (PLIs) determine the efficacy and safety profiles of small molecule drugs. Existing methods rely on either structural information or resource-intensive computations to predict PLI, casting doubt on whether it is possible to perform structure-free PLI predictions at low computational cost. Here we show that a light-weight graph neural network (GNN), trained with quantitative PLIs of a small number of proteins and ligands, is able to predict the strength of unseen PLIs. The model has no direct access to structural information about the protein-ligand complexes. Instead, the predictive power is provided by encoding the entire chemical and proteomic space in a single heterogeneous graph, encapsulating primary protein sequence, gene expression, the protein-protein interaction network, and structural similarities between ligands. This novel approach performs competitively with, or better than, structure-aware models. Our results suggest that existing PLI prediction methods may be improved by incorporating representation learning techniques that embed biological and chemical knowledge.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.