ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Classification of anatomy and treatment approaches for aneurysms originating from the proximal of the A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery in clinical settings.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the spatial relationship between A1 segment proximal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms and their main trunks, classify them anatomically and develop targeted treatment strategies. Methods: This single-center retrospective analysis involved 39 patients diagnosed with aneurysms originating from the proximal of A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery (2014-2023). Classify the patient's aneurysm into 5 types based on the location of the neck involving the carrier artery and the spatial relationship and projection direction of the aneurysm body with the carrier artery, and outcomes from treatment methods were compared. Results: Among 39 aneurysms, 18 cases underwent endovascular intervention treatment, including 6 cases of stent assisted embolization, 1 case of flow-diverter embolization, 5 cases of balloon assisted embolization, and 6 cases of simple coiling. At discharged, the mRS score of all endovascularly treated patients was 0, and the GOS score was 5 at 6 months after discharge. At discharge, the mRS score of microsurgical clipping treated patients was 0 for 15 cases, 3 for 1 case, 4 for 1 case and 5 for 2 cases. Six months after discharge, the GOS score was 5 for 16 cases, 4 for 2 cases, 3 for 2 cases, and 1 for 1 case. GOS outcomes at 6 months were better for endovascularly treated patients ( Conclusion: Results showed better outcomes for the endovascular treatment group compared to microsurgical clipping at 6 months after surgery. The anatomical classification of aneurysms in this region may be of help to develop effective treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.