ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2024
PANDA-3D: protein function prediction based on AlphaFold models.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting co-expression-based automated function prediction in yeast with neural networks and updated Gene Ontology annotations.PloS one · 2026Article
- Application of Protein Structure Encodings and Sequence Embeddings for Transporter Substrate Prediction.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- GOBoost: leveraging long-tail gene ontology terms for accurate protein function prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Evaluating sequence and structural similarity metrics for predicting shared paralog functions.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- From data to discovery: leveraging big data in plant natural products biosynthesis research.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Tracing the function expansion for a primordial protein fold in the era of fold-based function prediction: β-trefoil.PloS one · 2025Article
- Multimeric protein interaction and complex prediction: Structure, dynamics and function.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous protein function predictors primarily make predictions from amino acid sequences instead of tertiary structures because of the limited number of experimentally determined structures and the unsatisfying qualities of predicted structures. AlphaFold recently achieved promising performances when predicting protein tertiary structures, and the AlphaFold protein structure database (AlphaFold DB) is fast-expanding. Therefore, we aimed to develop a deep-learning tool that is specifically trained with AlphaFold models and predict GO terms from AlphaFold models. We developed an advanced learning architecture by combining geometric vector perceptron graph neural networks and variant transformer decoder layers for multi-label classification. PANDA-3D predicts gene ontology (GO) terms from the predicted structures of AlphaFold and the embeddings of amino acid sequences based on a large language model. Our method significantly outperformed a state-of-the-art deep-learning method that was trained with experimentally determined tertiary structures, and either outperformed or was comparable with several other language-model-based state-of-the-art methods with amino acid sequences as input. PANDA-3D is tailored to AlphaFold models, and the AlphaFold DB currently contains over 200 million predicted protein structures (as of May 1st, 2023), making PANDA-3D a useful tool that can accurately annotate the functions of a large number of proteins. PANDA-3D can be freely accessed as a web server from http://dna.cs.miami.edu/PANDA-3D/ and as a repository from https://github.com/zwang-bioinformatics/PANDA-3D.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.