Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39108596›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024

CT-based finite element simulating spatial bone damage accumulation predicts metastatic human vertebrae strength and stiffness.

Zahra Soltani, Michelle Xu, Raul Radovitzky, Marc A Stadelmann, David Hackney, Ron N Alkalay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Can Multi-Vertebral CT-Based Finite Element Models Accurately Predict Strains? An In Vitro Validation Study.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zahra Soltani *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Michelle Xu *Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Raul RadovitzkyDepartment of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Marc A StadelmannCentre for Artificial Intelligence, ZHAW School of Engineering, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Zurich, Switzerland.
David HackneyDepartment of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Ron N AlkalayDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

Predicting Fracture Risk in Patients Treated with Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastatic DiseaseR01AR075964 · NIAMS · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ALKALAY, RON N, BALBONI, TRACY A. · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
Predicting Fracture Risk in Patients Treated with Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastatic DiseaseR56AR075964 · NIAMS · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ALKALAY, RON N, BALBONI, TRACY A. · 2019 to 2019
$662k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR075964NIAMS NIH HHS R56 AR075964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

bone damage modelfinite element frameworkfracture predictionhuman metastatic vertebraespine

Identifiers

PMID39108596
PMCPMC11300227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.