ArticleInternational journal of women's health2024
Vulvodynia, Genital Eczema and Lichen Sclerosus: What are the Successful Treatments from a Patient's Perspective?
Article in International journal of women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Idiopathic vulvodynia - a psychosomatic disease? A cross-sectional single-center study.BMC women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Genital pain treatment regimens range from local or systemic pharmacological to non-pharmacological, manual and psychosexual therapies with poor to moderate evidence for their efficiency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the subjective therapeutic response (genital pain relief) of different treatment modalities for vulvodynia and the most prevalent other vulvar pathologies, chronic vulvar eczema and lichen sclerosus by means of a cross-sectional survey. Material and Methods: A questionnaire-based cohort study that included 128 vulvodynia, 116 eczema and 79 lichen sclerosus patients was used. All patients attended the vulvar clinic at the University Hospital of Zurich. The patients who had been treated were surveyed from January to October 2022, using a customized online questionnaire consisting of 37 questions on symptoms and treatment outcomes for guideline-recommended treatment modalities. The study was approved by the Cantonal Ethics Review Board of Zurich. Results: Altogether, 41 patients with vulvodynia, 37 with vulvar eczema and 23 with lichen sclerosus returned the questionnaire. The three groups were similar regarding pain characteristics and comorbidities. All three patient groups reported having benefited from non-pharmacological treatment (improvement rate vulvodynia 54%; eczema 51%; lichen sclerosus 58%), from topical (55%; 55%; 75%) and from locally invasive (46%; 66%; 50%) treatments. Overall, there was no significant difference in subjective treatment outcome between non-pharmacological, locally invasive, and topical treatments for vulvodynia, eczema, and lichen sclerosus. However, the use of oral medication was reported to be significantly less effective (p-value 0.050). Conclusion: In conclusion, we found that in the patients' perception, topical, invasive and non-pharmacological treatments, but not oral medications, are helpful for genital pain relief in women with vulvodynia, vulvar eczema, and lichen sclerosus. Therefore, we recommend an escalating therapy approach with first-line non-pharmacological treatments together with topical therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.