ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
LRRK2-Associated Parkinsonism With and Without
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Among LRRK2-associated parkinsonism cases with nigral degeneration, over two-thirds demonstrate evidence of pathologic alpha-synuclein, but many do not. Understanding the clinical phenotype and underlying biology in such individuals is critical for therapeutic development. Our objective was to compare clinical and biomarker features, and rate of progression over 4 years follow-up, among LRRK2-associated parkinsonism cases with and without Methods: Data were from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative, a multicenter prospective cohort study. The sample included individuals diagnosed with Parkinson disease with pathogenic variants in LRRK2. Presence of CSF alpha-synuclein aggregation was assessed with seed amplification assay. A range of clinician- and patient- reported outcome assessments were administered. Biomarkers included dopamine transporter SPECT scan, CSF amyloid-beta Results: 148 LRRK2-parkinsonism cases (86% with G2019S variant), 46 negative and 102 positive for CSF alpha-synuclein seed amplification assay were included. At baseline, the negative group were older than the positive group (median [interquartile range] 69.1 [65.2-72.3] vs 61.5 [55.6-66.9] years, p<0.001) and a greater proportion were female (28 (61%) vs 43 (42%), p=0.035). Despite being older, the negative group had similar duration since diagnosis, and similar motor rating scale (16 [11-23] vs 16 [10-22], p=0.480) though lower levodopa equivalents. Only 13 (29%) of the negative group were hyposmic, compared to 75 (77%) of the positive group. Lowest putamen dopamine transporter binding expected for age and sex was greater in the negative vs positive groups (0.36 [0.29-0.45] vs 0.26 [0.22-0.37], p<0.001). Serum neurofilament light chain was higher in the negative group compared to the positive group (17.10 [13.60-22.10] vs 10.50 [8.43-14.70]; age-adjusted p-value=0.013). In terms of longitudinal change, the negative group remained stable in functional rating scale score in contrast to the positive group who had a significant increase (worsening) of 0.729 per year (p=0.037), but no other differences in trajectory were found. Conclusion: Among individuals diagnosed with Parkinson disease with pathogenic variants in the LRRK2 gene, we found clinical and biomarker differences in cases without versus with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.