Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39108465›Full record

ArticleCytoJournal2024

Enhancing the cytological features and diagnostic significance of cerebrospinal fluid in bacterial meningitis.

Yong Long, Yufen Peng, Zhaojun Huang, Min Zhu, Chenyi Wan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CytoJournal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yong LongDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Yufen PengDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Zhaojun HuangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Min ZhuDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Chenyi WanDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the cytological features and diagnostic significance of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in bacterial meningitis (BM). Material and Methods: Patients diagnosed with BM at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University Hospital between August 2021 and April 2022 were enrolled. Clinical, cranial imaging, CSF-next-generation sequencing, CSF examination, and CSF cytology data were retrospectively analyzed. CSF cytology samples were prepared using a CSF cell pelletizer (precipitation method) and stained using the May-Grunwald-Glemsa (MGG) method. The χ Results: Eight patients (four males and four females), aged 41-67 years, were included. Among them, two patients had undergone brain surgery within the past 4 months, one patient had an 8-year history of otitis media, and two patients had a history of sudden toothache. Clinical manifestations included fever, headache, sudden disturbance of consciousness, and neck stiffness. CSF cytology revealed abnormal inflammatory changes dominated by neutrophils in seven patients. Routine CSF cell counts exceeded 100/uL in only four cases, indicating a higher positive rate of CSF cytology for detecting CSF inflammatory reactions compared to routine cell count. Conclusion: Comparative detection of bacteria through the observation of CSF cytology inflammatory status in BM patients are more useful for diagnosing BM than routine CSF counts.

Indexed as

Bacterial meningitisCerebrospinal fluidCytologyInflammatory

Identifiers

PMID39108465
PMCPMC11302218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.