ReviewSurgical neurology international2024
Perioperative blood transfusion management in surgical resection of intracranial meningiomas: A meta-analysis.
Review in Surgical neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perioperative anemia and patient blood management in neurosurgery and neurocritical care: a narrative review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gross total resection (GTR) of intracranial meningiomas is curative in most cases. However, perioperative blood transfusions may be necessary for complex skull bases and/or high-grade meningiomas. Guidelines for blood transfusions during intracranial meningioma surgery remain unclear. This scoping review aims to delineate the main characteristics of patients who underwent intracranial meningioma surgery, the prevalence of the selected patients who required blood transfusions, and common causes for transfusion. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines to include studies reporting eligibility, protocols, and potential complications related to blood transfusion within the perioperative management of intracranial meningiomas. Results: A total of 33 articles encompassing 3009 meningioma patients were included in the study. The most common symptom was headache (18%), and the most frequent type of meningioma was World Health Organization grade-1 meningothelial (50.4%). The lateral supraorbital approach was the most common surgical corridor (59.1%) in skull base meningiomas, and most patients underwent GTR (69%). Blood transfusion was required for 20% of patients, with a mean estimated intraoperative blood loss of 703 mL (ranging from 200 mL to 2000 mL). The main indications for blood transfusion in meningioma surgery were intraoperative blood loss (86%) and preoperative anemia (7.3%). Conclusion: This scoping found that 20% of the included patients required blood transfusion. It also points out that several factors could influence the necessity for a transfusion, encompassing surgical blood loss, pre-existing anemia, and the surgery's length. This scoping review may provide surgeons with a potential guide to inform their decision-making process regarding blood transfusions during meningioma surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.