ArticleCase reports in obstetrics and gynecology2024
Combined Treatment of Uterine Arteriovenous Malformation Using a 16 Fr Miniresectoscope in an Office Setting Without Anesthesia: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are abnormal connections between arteries and veins that bypass the capillary system. Among AVMs, uterine ones are very rare, and it is not possible to have clear data on their incidence, as a good part of the patients remain clinically asymptomatic. Uterine AVMs consist of abnormal communications between branches of the uterine artery and the myometrial venous plexus. They can lead to significant bleeding, resulting in severe anemia and the need for transfusions. Both medical and surgical therapeutic approaches are described in the literature; as regards surgical treatments, the hysteroscopic excision of the endometrial mass represents a conservative and minimally invasive approach. However, there are no reported cases in the literature of AVMs treated using a hysteroscopic approach under local anesthesia and in an office setting. In this article, we propose the case of a young woman diagnosed with postpartum uterine AVM, treated using a 16 Fr miniresectoscope (GUBBINI system; Tontarra Medizintechnik®, Tuttlingen, Germany) in an office setting with a pain control protocol (pericervical infiltration and nitrous oxide via bucconasal mask). No complications occurred, and the woman was discharged immediately after the procedure. Finally, the patient was asked how tolerable and acceptable the procedure was compared to expectations; the woman defined the procedure as very bearable and well tolerated. The outpatient treatment, with an adequate pain control protocol, proved to be less invasive for the woman, did not require narcosis and hospital admission, but was equally therapeutic and effective compared to the treatment performed in the operating room.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.