Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39108340›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2024

An automatic measure for speech intelligibility in dysarthrias-validation across multiple languages and neurological disorders.

Johannes Tröger, Felix Dörr, Louisa Schwed, Nicklas Linz, Alexandra König, Tabea Thies, Michael T. Barbe, Juan Rafael Orozco-Arroyave, Jan Rusz

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Clinical utility of digital technologies in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Johannes Trögerki elements GmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Felix Dörrki elements GmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Louisa Schwedki elements GmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Nicklas Linzki elements GmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Alexandra Königki elements GmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Tabea ThiesDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Michael T. BarbeDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Juan Rafael Orozco-ArroyaveGITA Lab, Faculty of Engineering, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Jan RuszDepartment of Circuit Theory, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Dysarthria, a motor speech disorder caused by muscle weakness or paralysis, severely impacts speech intelligibility and quality of life. The condition is prevalent in motor speech disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD), atypical parkinsonism such as progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), Huntington's disease (HD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Improving intelligibility is not only an outcome that matters to patients but can also play a critical role as an endpoint in clinical research and drug development. This study validates a digital measure for speech intelligibility, the ki: SB-M intelligibility score, across various motor speech disorders and languages following the Digital Medicine Society (DiMe) V3 framework. Methods: The study used four datasets: healthy controls (HCs) and patients with PD, HD, PSP, and ALS from Czech, Colombian, and German populations. Participants' speech intelligibility was assessed using the ki: SB-M intelligibility score, which is derived from automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems. Verification with inter-ASR reliability and temporal consistency, analytical validation with correlations to gold standard clinical dysarthria scores in each disease, and clinical validation with group comparisons between HCs and patients were performed. Results: Verification showed good to excellent inter-rater reliability between ASR systems and fair to good consistency. Analytical validation revealed significant correlations between the SB-M intelligibility score and established clinical measures for speech impairments across all patient groups and languages. Clinical validation demonstrated significant differences in intelligibility scores between pathological groups and healthy controls, indicating the measure's discriminative capability. Discussion: The ki: SB-M intelligibility score is a reliable, valid, and clinically relevant tool for assessing speech intelligibility in motor speech disorders. It holds promise for improving clinical trials through automated, objective, and scalable assessments. Future studies should explore its utility in monitoring disease progression and therapeutic efficacy as well as add data from further dysarthrias to the validation.

Indexed as

amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)digital biomarkersHuntington's disease (HD)intelligibilityParkinson's disease (PD)progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP)speech analysis

Identifiers

PMID39108340
PMCPMC11300433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.