Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39108294›Full record

ArticleArXiv2024

A study of animal action segmentation algorithms across supervised, unsupervised, and semi-supervised learning paradigms.

Ari Blau, Evan S Schaffer, Neeli Mishra, Nathaniel J Miska, International Brain Laboratory, Liam Paninski, Matthew R Whiteway

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ari BlauDepartment of Statistics, Columbia University.
Evan S SchafferIcahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai.
Neeli MishraZuckerman Institute, Columbia University.
Nathaniel J MiskaSainsbury Wellcome Centre, University College London.
International Brain Laboratory
Liam PaninskiDepartment of Statistics, Columbia University.
Matthew R WhitewayZuckerman Institute, Columbia University.

Funding

State-dependent Decision-making in Brainwide Neural CircuitsU19NS123716 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI ZADOR, ANTHONY M · 2021 to 2025
$18.2M
Validating Theoretical Models with Neurophysiology and OptogeneticsU19NS107613 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MILLER, KENNETH D, SCANZIANI, MASSIMO · 2018 to 2022
$16.7M
NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS107613NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS123716Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Action segmentation of behavioral videos is the process of labeling each frame as belonging to one or more discrete classes, and is a crucial component of many studies that investigate animal behavior. A wide range of algorithms exist to automatically parse discrete animal behavior, encompassing supervised, unsupervised, and semi-supervised learning paradigms. These algorithms - which include tree-based models, deep neural networks, and graphical models - differ widely in their structure and assumptions on the data. Using four datasets spanning multiple species - fly, mouse, and human - we systematically study how the outputs of these various algorithms align with manually annotated behaviors of interest. Along the way, we introduce a semi-supervised action segmentation model that bridges the gap between supervised deep neural networks and unsupervised graphical models. We find that fully supervised temporal convolutional networks with the addition of temporal information in the observations perform the best on our supervised metrics across all datasets.

Identifiers

PMID39108294
PMCPMC11302674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.