SynthesisFrontiers in surgery2024
Effects of different drugs in combination with PKP/PVP on postoperative pain in patients with osteoporotic compression fractures: a network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the postoperative pain effect and clinical efficacy of different drugs combined with PKP or PVP in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) through a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Methods: We searched five electronic databases, namely, MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials online, for the treatment of OVCFs through March 2023 with keywords zoledronic acid (ZOL), teriparatide (TPTD or PTH 1-34), and calcitonin (CT) combined with PKP/PVP. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were the primary outcomes of the network meta-analysis, and the secondary outcome was the diagnostic marker bone mineral density (BMD). Results: Eighteen studies involving 2,374 patients were included in this study. The network meta-analysis revealed that, in terms of reducing VAS scores, compared with PVP surgery alone, PVP combined with TPTD was most likely to be the treatment associated with the greatest pain relief [MD = -4.99, 95% CI = (-7.45, -2.52)]. In terms of reducing the ODI dysfunction score, compared with PKP combined with Cal, PKP combined with ZOL had the highest probability of being the best treatment option [MD = -9.11, 95% CI = (-14.27, -3.95)]. In terms of protecting against bone density loss, compared with PKP surgery alone, treatment with PKP combined with ZOL had the best effect [MD = 0.39, 95% CI = (0.13,0.65)]. Conclusions: Based on the network meta-analysis and SUCRA rankings, this study concluded that adding teriparatide has the advantage of reducing VAS pain scores compared with PVP alone and that adding zoledronate is a more effective treatment for reducing ODI scores compared with PKP combined with Cal and preserving BMD compared with PKP alone. However, additional high-quality studies are needed to verify our findings. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=358445, identifier CRD42022358445.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.