Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39108174›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2025

Site-specific cancer mortality after low-level exposure to ionizing radiation: findings from an update of the International Nuclear Workers Study (INWORKS).

David B Richardson, Dominique Laurier, Klervi Leuraud, Michael Gillies, Richard Haylock, Kaitlin Kelly-Reif, Stephen Bertke, Robert D Daniels, Isabelle Thierry-Chef, Monika Moissonnier and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A One Health Perspective on Cancer: A Narrative Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

David B RichardsonDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8550-0212
Dominique LaurierHealth Division, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, PSE-SANTE, F-92260, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Klervi LeuraudHealth Division, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, PSE-SANTE, F-92260, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Michael GilliesRadiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Division, UK Health Security Agency, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX110RQ, United Kingdom.
Richard HaylockRadiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Division, UK Health Security Agency, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX110RQ, United Kingdom.
Kaitlin Kelly-ReifDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226, United States.
Stephen BertkeDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226, United States.
Robert D DanielsDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3915-7991
Isabelle Thierry-ChefMedical Radiation Group, Barcelona Institute of Global Health, Barcelona 08003, Spain.
Monika MoissonnierInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon 69007, France.
Ausrele KesminieneInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon 69007, France.
Mary K Schubauer-BeriganInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon 69007, France.

Funding

Low-Dose Exposure to Ionizing Radiation in Adulthood and Subsequent CancerR01CA242852 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID B RICHARDSON · 2019 to 2026
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA242852Orano and Electricité de FranceUS National Cancer Institute R01CA242852US National Institute for Occupational Safety and HealthWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major update to the International Nuclear Workers Study was undertaken that allows us to report updated estimates of associations between radiation and site-specific solid cancer mortality. A cohort of 309 932 nuclear workers employed in France, the United Kingdom, and the United States were monitored for external radiation exposure. Associations of radiation with cancer mortality were quantified as the excess relative rate (ERR) per gray (Gy) using a maximum likelihood and a Markov chain Monte Carlo method (to stabilize estimates via a hierarchical regression). The analysis included 28 089 deaths due to solid cancer, the most common being lung, prostate, and colon cancer. Using maximum likelihood, positive estimates of ERR per Gy were obtained for stomach, colon, rectum, pancreas, peritoneum, larynx, lung, pleura/mesothelioma, bone and connective tissue, skin, prostate, testis, bladder, kidney, thyroid, and residual cancers. Negative estimates of ERR per Gy were found cancers of oral cavity and pharynx, esophagus, and ovary. A hierarchical model stabilized site-specific estimates of association, including for lung (ERR per Gy = 0.65; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.24-1.07), prostate (ERR per Gy = 0.44; 95% CrI, -0.06 to 0.91), and colon cancer (ERR per Gy = 0.53; 95% CrI, -0.07 to 1.11). The results contribute evidence regarding associations between low-dose radiation and cancer.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Radiation-InducedNuclear Power PlantsOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureRadiation, IonizingAdultAgedFemaleFranceHumansMaleMarkov ChainsMiddle AgedMonte Carlo MethodUnited KingdomUnited Statescancercohort studiesionizing radiationmortality studynuclear workersoccupational exposures

Identifiers

PMID39108174
PMCPMC13368604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.