ArticleThe clinical respiratory journal2024
Unplanned Perioperative Reoperation Following Pulmonary Resection in Lung Cancer Patients: A Report of a Single-Center Experience.
Article in The clinical respiratory journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of electrical stimulation for postoperative rehabilitation of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary resection is an important part of comprehensive treatment of lung cancer. Despite the progress in recent thoracic surgery, reoperation is occasionally inevitable for managing severe perioperative complications. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and causes of perioperative reoperation in lung cancer patients.
methodsWe retrospectively collected patients who underwent reoperation following pulmonary resection from January 2010 to February 2021 in China-Japan Friendship Hospital.
resultsAmong the 5032 lung cancer patients who received primary pulmonary resection in our institute, 37 patients underwent perioperative reoperation with the rate being 0.74%. Lobectomy was the most frequently executed procedure (56.8%). The mean duration of the primary surgery was 143.6 ± 65.1 min. About half of the cases received secondary surgery within 24 h of the primary surgery, whereas only one case underwent secondary surgery 30 days after the primary surgery (due to chylous leakage). The major causes of the reoperation were bleeding (73.0%), chylous leakage (13.5%), lobar torsion (5.4%), air leakage (2.7%), atelectasis (2.9%), and cardiac herniation (2.7%).
conclusionThe most prevalent reasons for unplanned reoperation following pulmonary resection in lung cancer patients include bleeding, chylous leakage, and lobar torsion. The strict control of the surgical indications and standardization of surgical procedures are fundamental to reduce unplanned secondary operations after pulmonary resections. Timely identification of the need to secondary surgery is also important to ensure patients' safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.