SynthesisJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2024
Associated factors of osteoporosis in Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis: a new perspective on risk factors and clinical prediction models.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Review
- Temporal progression of bone loss, trabecular microarchitectural deterioration, and mechanical impairment in a rat model of collagen-induced arthritis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating disease activity scores and CBC-derived indices in relation to osteoporosis risk in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the factors associated of osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in China.
methodsPubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and four Chinese electronic databases were searched for observational studies without language restrictions that reported the factors associated of osteoporosis from inception to February 2023. A modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale evaluated the risk of bias. Statistical heterogeneity among the included studies was analyzed using Cochran Q and I2 tests. Begg and Egger tests were used to assess the publication bias.
resultsA total of 15 studies were finally included. The meta-analysis showed that 10 factors were grouped into three themes with statistical significance: (1) demographics theme: age ≥50 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.161; 95% CI, 1.111-1.231; p < 0.001), low body mass index (BMI) (OR = 1.248; 95% CI, 1.192-1.312; p < 0.001), female (OR = 5.174; 95% CI, 3.058-7.290; p < 0.001), and menopause (OR = 4.917; 95% CI, 1.558-15.523; I2 = 0.0%; p = 0.007); (2) RA-related factor theme: disease duration (OR = 1.083; 95% CI, 1.038-1.127; p < 0.001), and glucocorticoids (OR = 2.740; 95% CI, 2.000-3.750; p < 0.001); (3) relevant physiological indicators or scores theme: low 25(OH)D 3 (OR = 1.009; 95% CI, 1.003-1.016; p < 0.001), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (OR = 1.489; 95% CI, 1.041-2.130; p = 0.029), high Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) score (OR = 2.5991; 95% CI, 1.094-6.138; p < 0.001); and β-isomerized C-terminal telopeptide (β-CTx) (OR = 1.009; 95% CI, 1.003-1.016; p = 0.005).
conclusionOsteoporosis in patients with RA is associated with various factors. Therefore, patients with RA should be monitored in a timely manner and targeted interventions should be taken. In addition, further longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the direct link between multiple factors and osteoporosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.