Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39107882›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2024

The Optimal Variation Range of Posterior Condylar Offset Associated with Positive Clinical Outcomes of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Analysis.

Yanlin Zhong, Zengfa Deng, Cheng Gu, Ming Li, Yan Kang, Weiming Liao, Zhiqi Zhang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07517614 (Prospective Evaluation of Posterior and Anterior Condylar Offset and Their Impact on Functional Outcomes in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07517614 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Evaluation of Posterior and Anterior Condylar Offset and Their Impact on Functional Outcomes in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

TypeobservationalSponsorSB Istanbul Education and Research HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsKnee Arthritis Osteoarthritis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yanlin ZhongDepartment of Joint Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zengfa DengDepartment of Joint Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Cheng GuDepartment of Joint Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0984-1821
Ming LiDepartment of Joint Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yan KangDepartment of Joint Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Weiming LiaoDepartment of Joint Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiqi ZhangDepartment of Joint Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9086-2453

Funding

Guangdong Natural Science Funds 2021B1515020008Guangzhou Science Funds 2024A04J6487National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172406National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172467Sun Yat-sen University 2013002Sun Yat-sen University R07005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePosterior condylar offset (PCO) and anterior condylar offset (ACO) exert an influence on the sagittal alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is no common consensus that the variation range of posterior condylar offset (PCO) is associated with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the optimum variation range of PCO. This study aims to investigate the correlation between PCO and the PROMs of primary TKA for osteoarthritis (OA) and find out the optimal variation range of the PCO.

methodsIn this study, we performed a radiographic analysis of 106 patients (112 knees) with primary TKA. Patients were divided into two cohorts (A and B) according to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC). Correlations between the sagittal parameter and WOMAC were investigated using univariate and multivariate analysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to establish the cut-off value for the optimal variation range. We then further investigated how different variation range affects the WOMAC subscale score and forgotten-joint-score-12 (FJS-12).

resultsUnivariate analysis revealed a correlation between the variation range of PCO (p < 0.01), ACO (p < 0.01) and PROMs. Multivariate analysis showed that only PCO was associated with PROMs. In the ROC graph, the cut-off value of the variation range of PCO is 2.85 mm (AUC = 0.66, Youden index = 0.26). The WOMAC functional ability score of the group outside the PCO variation range of 2.85 mm significantly increased compared to the group within the range.

conclusionIn this study, PCO variation was significantly associated with clinical outcomes in TKA and the optimal PCO variation range was within 2.85 mm. Maintaining the PCO variation within 2.85 mm could enhance functional recovery and patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeOsteoarthritis, KneePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesKneeOsteoarthritisPosterior condylar offsetTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39107882
PMCPMC11541138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.