Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39107817›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2024

Efficient inference of large prokaryotic pangenomes with PanTA.

Duc Quang Le, Tien Anh Nguyen, Son Hoang Nguyen, Tam Thi Nguyen, Canh Hao Nguyen, Huong Thanh Phung, Tho Huu Ho, Nam S Vo, Trang Nguyen, Hoang Anh Nguyen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Species identification and genotyping ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  7. Genotype-phenotype modeling of light ecotypes inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Duc Quang Le *AMROMICS JSC, Nghe An, Vietnam.
Tien Anh Nguyen *AMROMICS JSC, Nghe An, Vietnam.
Son Hoang Nguyen *AMROMICS JSC, Nghe An, Vietnam.
Tam Thi NguyenOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Canh Hao NguyenBioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Huong Thanh PhungFaculty of Biotechnology, Hanoi University of Pharmacy, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Tho Huu HoDepartment of Medical Microbiology, The 103 Military Hospital, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Nam S VoCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Vingroup Big Data Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Trang NguyenAMROMICS JSC, Nghe An, Vietnam.
Hoang Anh NguyenAMROMICS JSC, Nghe An, Vietnam.
Minh Duc CaoAMROMICS JSC, Nghe An, Vietnam. minhduc.cao@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4079-2383

Funding

VinIF VINIF.2019.DA11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pangenome inference is an indispensable step in bacterial genomics, yet its scalability poses a challenge due to the rapid growth of genomic collections. This paper presents PanTA, a software package designed for constructing pangenomes of large bacterial datasets, showing unprecedented efficiency levels multiple times higher than existing tools. PanTA introduces a novel mechanism to construct the pangenome progressively without rebuilding the accumulated collection from scratch. The progressive mode is shown to consume orders of magnitude less computational resources than existing solutions in managing growing datasets. The software is open source and is publicly available at https://github.com/amromics/panta and at 10.6084/m9.figshare.23724705 .

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialSoftwareBacteriaGenomicsPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID39107817
PMCPMC11304767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.