Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39107769›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2024

Filicide in Africa: a systematic review.

Joseph Mayanja Ssekitto, Joan Abaatyo, Angella Namatovu, Rita Akatusasira, Emmanuel Kibet, Stanley Githaiga Kamau, Mark Mohan Kaggwa

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joseph Mayanja SsekittoFaculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Joan AbaatyoDepartment of Psychiatry, Uganda Christian University, Kampala, Uganda. joandux@gmail.com.
Angella NamatovuFaculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Rita AkatusasiraFaculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Emmanuel KibetFaculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Stanley Githaiga KamauFaculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Mark Mohan KaggwaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFilicide, the act of a parent or parental figure killing their child, has been reported in various African countries. However, there is a lack of comprehensive reviews on the prevalence and associated factors of filicide across the African continent, which is characterized by diverse cultural beliefs and practices. This review aims to examine the prevalence and risk factors of filicide in Africa.

methodsThis review included studies on filicide in Africa, identified through searches in various databases (PubMed, Scopus, Africa Journal Online, and Google Scholar) using relevant keywords. The Mendeley reference manager was used to organize all identified articles and remove duplicate entries. A two-round screening process was conducted by two independent reviewers, with the final set of articles selected through mutual agreement. The quality of the studies was then assessed.

resultsOut of the 107 retrieved articles, only 15 were included in the review. These studies revealed diverse prevalence rates: 3.7% of total homicides, 1.38% of deaths from family violence, and 13.02% for autopsied children. Various potential risk factors for filicide were identified, including unwanted pregnancies, marital conflicts, family disputes and violence, low socio-economic status, mental health issues in perpetrators, and mental, physical, or neurological vulnerabilities in victims. Cultural beliefs were also recognized as contributing factors to filicide.

conclusionFilicide is a complex and multi-dimensional issue influenced by various individual, familial, and societal factors. The review highlighted a high prevalence of filicide in Africa, shaped by these diverse factors.

Indexed as

Domestic ViolenceHomicideAfricaChildFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceRisk FactorsAfricaFilicideInfanticideNeonaticide

Identifiers

PMID39107769
PMCPMC11302348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.