Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39107737›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2024

Influence of titanium and titanium-zirconium alloy as implant materials on implant stability of maxillary implant retained overdenture: a randomized clinical trial.

Amany Ibrahim Abd El-Hady, Hany Ibrahim Eid, Shaimaa Lotfy Mohamed, Sawsan Maged Fadl

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06334770 (Influence of Roxolid Implant Material on the Implant Stability of Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06334770 nacompletednot on this map

Influence of Roxolid Implant Material on the Implant Stability of Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled18ConditionsCompletely Edentulous PatientsArmsRoxolid implants, Titanium implants
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amany Ibrahim Abd El-HadyOral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. amanyibrahim@dent.asu.edu.eg.
Hany Ibrahim EidOral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Shaimaa Lotfy MohamedOral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Sawsan Maged FadlOral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-term success of implant restoration depends on many factors one of them is the sufficient implant stability which is lowered in compromised bone density sites such as the maxilla as it is categorized as type III & IV bone, so searching for a new innovation and updates in implant material and features is very mandatory. So, the aim of this study was to compare between two implant materials (roxolid and traditional titanium) on the primary and secondary stability of implant retained maxillary overdenture.

methodsEighteen completely edentulous patients were selected. All patients received maxillary implant-retained overdentures and lower complete dentures; patients were divided equally into two groups according to the type of implant materials. Group A received a total number of 36 implants made of roxolid material and Group B received a total number of 36 implants made of traditional titanium alloys. Implant stability was assessed using ostell device, the primary implant stability was measured at the day of implant installation however, secondary implant stability was measured after six weeks of implant placement. Paired t-test was used to compare between primary and secondary stability in the same group and an independent t-test was used to compare between the two groups with a significant level < 0.05.

resultsIndependent t-test revealed a significant difference between the two groups with p -value = 0.0141 regarding primary stability and p-value < 0.001 regarding secondary stability, as roxolid implant group was statistically higher stability than titanium group in both. Paired t- test showed a statistically significant difference in roxolid implant group with p-value = 0.0122 however, there was non-statistically significant difference in titanium group with p-value = 0.636. Mann Whitney test showed a significant difference between the two groups regarding amount of change in stability with p value = 0.191. roxolid implant group showed a higher amount of change in stability than the titanium implant group.

conclusionWithin the limitation of this study, it could be concluded that: Roxolid implants showed promising results regarding primary and secondary stability compared to conventional Titanium implants and can be a better alternative in implant retained maxillary overdentures.

trial registrationRetrospectively NCT06334770 at 26-3-2024.

Indexed as

Dental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedDenture, OverlayMaxillaTitaniumAgedAlloysDental AlloysDental ImplantsDental MaterialsDenture RetentionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedZirconiumAlloysDental AlloysDental ImplantsDental MaterialsTitaniumTi-Zr alloyZirconiumImplant StabilityOstellRoxolid

Identifiers

PMID39107737
PMCPMC11305035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.