ReviewNeurocritical care2025
Clinical Prediction Models in Neurocritical Care: An Overview of the Literature and Example Application to Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Traumatic Brain Injury.
Review in Neurocritical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Creation and validation of a mortality risk prediction model for ICU patients with traumatic brain injury: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical prediction models serve as valuable instruments for assessing the risk of crucial outcomes and facilitating decision-making in clinical settings. Constructing these models requires nuanced analytical decisions and expertise informed by the current statistical literature. Access and thorough understanding of such literature may be limited for neurocritical care physicians, which may hinder the interpretation of existing predictive models. The present emphasis is on narrowing this knowledge gap by providing neurocritical care specialists with methodological guidance for interpreting predictive models in neurocritical care. Presented are the statistical learning principles integral to constructing a model predicting hospital mortality (nonsurvival during hospitalization) in patients with moderate and severe blunt traumatic brain injury using components of the IMPACT-Core model. Discussion encompasses critical elements such as model flexibility, hyperparameter selection, data imbalance, cross-validation, model assessment (discrimination and calibration), prediction instability, and probability thresholds. The intricate interplay among these components, the data set, and the clincal context of neurocritical care is elaborated. Leveraging this comprehensive exploration of statistical learning can enhance comprehension of articles encompassing model generation, tailored clinical care, and, ultimately, better interpretation and clinical applicability of predictive models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39107660What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.