ArticleNeurocritical care2025
Phenotypes of Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Complications, and Outcomes.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-driven clustering for phenotyping life-threatening prehospital trauma.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- A Small Step Toward Rational Characterization of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Phenotypes.Neurocritical care · 2025Article
- Statins in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage to Prevent Delayed Cerebral Ischemia: Old Drugs for New Strategies?Neurocritical care · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this study was to define clinically meaningful phenotypes of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) using machine learning.
methodsWe used patient data from two US medical centers and the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage-II clinical trial. We used k-prototypes to partition patient admission data. We then used silhouette method calculations and elbow method heuristics to optimize the clusters. Associations between phenotypes, complications (e.g., seizures), and functional outcomes were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis H-test or χ
resultsThere were 916 patients; the mean age was 63.8 ± 14.1 years, and 426 patients were female (46.5%). Three distinct clinical phenotypes emerged: patients with small hematomas, elevated blood pressure, and Glasgow Coma Scale scores > 12 (n = 141, 26.6%); patients with hematoma expansion and elevated international normalized ratio (n = 204, 38.4%); and patients with median hematoma volumes of 24 (interquartile range 8.2-59.5) mL, who were more frequently Black or African American, and who were likely to have intraventricular hemorrhage (n = 186, 35.0%). There were associations between clinical phenotype and seizure (P = 0.024), length of stay (P = 0.001), discharge disposition (P < 0.001), and death or disability (modified Rankin Scale scores 4-6) at 3-months' follow-up (P < 0.001). We reproduced these three clinical phenotypes of ICH in an independent cohort (n = 385) for external validation.
conclusionsMachine learning identified three phenotypes of ICH that are clinically significant, associated with patient complications, and associated with functional outcomes. Cerebellar hematomas are an additional phenotype underrepresented in our data sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.