ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Exploring cognitive load through neuropsychological features: an analysis using fNIRS-eye tracking.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- fNIRS dataset of motor hand-gripping activity using the NIRSport2 system.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- Exploring cognitive load in anatomy education: a study of 3D virtual reality and 2D learning environments using fNIRS.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Spatial Guidance Overrides Dynamic Saliency in VR: An Eye-Tracking Study on Gestalt Grouping Mechanisms and Visual Attention Patterns.Journal of eye movement research · 2025Article
- Neural Mechanisms of the Impact of Rotated Terrain Symbols on Spatial Representation in Orienteers: Evidence from Eye-Tracking and Whole-Brain fNIRS Synchronization.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Eye Tracking-Enhanced Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysis: A Systematic Review on Data Efficiency, Interpretability, and Multimodal Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Multimodal neurobehavioral integration in binocular color rivalry: cortical-eye movement analysis under color, location, and combined stimuli.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Disciplinary barriers need communication: a behavioral and fNIRS study under group decision-making paradigm shift based on cabin design.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- The neural impact of editing on viewer narrative cognition in virtual reality films: eye-tracking insights into neural mechanisms.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Decoding basic emotional states through integration of an fNIRS-based brain-computer interface with supervised learning algorithms.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognition is crucial to brain function, and accurately classifying cognitive load is essential for understanding the psychological processes across tasks. This paper innovatively combines functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) with eye tracking technology to delve into the classification of cognitive load at the neurocognitive level. This integration overcomes the limitations of a single modality, addressing challenges such as feature selection, high dimensionality, and insufficient sample capacity. We employ fNIRS-eye tracking technology to collect neural activity and eye tracking data during various cognitive tasks, followed by preprocessing. Using the maximum relevance minimum redundancy algorithm, we extract the most relevant features and evaluate their impact on the classification task. We evaluate the classification performance by building models (naive Bayes, support vector machine, K-nearest neighbors, and random forest) and employing cross-validation. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of fNIRS-eye tracking, the maximum relevance minimum redundancy algorithm, and machine learning techniques in discriminating cognitive load levels. This study emphasizes the impact of the number of features on performance, highlighting the need for an optimal feature set to improve accuracy. These findings advance our understanding of neuroscientific features related to cognitive load, propelling neural psychology research to deeper levels and holding significant implications for future cognitive science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39107650What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.