ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024
ASO Author Reflections: The Timeless Debate Between Ivor-Lewis or McKeown Esophagectomy.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ivor-Lewis (IL) operation, esophagectomy and intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy and McKeown (MK) operation, esophagectomy, and cervical esophagogastrostomy are the most common procedures for esophageal cancer. The authors reported that the oncological outcomes and completeness of upper mediastinal dissection among esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing the IL or MK operations were not different in previous paper. Whether the IL procedure can show equivalent oncologic outcomes as compared to the MK procedure in cases of upper esophageal cancer needs to be further studied in the future. In addition, a comparison of the functional outcomes and quality of life between patients who had undergone the IL and MK operations needs to be explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39107602What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.