Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39107482›Full record

ReviewSurgical endoscopy2024

Current status of resident simulation training curricula: pearls and pitfalls.

Ivy N Haskins, Wen Hui Tan, Jessica Zaman, Yewande Alimi, Michael Awad, Marcoandrea Giorgi, Adham R Saad, Christian Perez, Rana M Higgins

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ivy N HaskinsDepartment of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Wen Hui TanDepartment of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Jessica ZamanDepartment of Surgery, Albany Medical Health Systems, Albany, NY, USA.
Yewande AlimiDepartment of Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Michael AwadDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Marcoandrea GiorgiDepartment of Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Adham R SaadDepartment of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Christian PerezDepartment of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Rana M HigginsDepartment of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. rhiggins@mcw.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6414-3340

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResidency programs are required to incorporate simulation into their training program. Ideally, simulation provides a safe environment for a trainee to be exposed to both common and challenging clinical scenarios. The purpose of this review is to detail the current state of the most commonly used laparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic surgery simulation programs in general surgery residency education, including resources required for successful implementation and benchmarks for evaluation. MATERIALS AND

methodsMembers of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Resident and Fellow Task Force (RAFT) Committee performed a literature review using PubMed and training websites. Information regarding the components of the most commonly used laparoscopic, endoscopic, and/or robotic simulation curriculum, including both formal and informal benchmarks for evaluating training competence, were collected.

resultsLaparoscopic simulation revolves around the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS). Proficiency-based as well as virtual simulation have been utilized for FLS training curricula. Challenges include less direct translation to the technical complexities that can arise in laparoscopic surgery. Endoscopic simulation focuses on the Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery. There are virtual reality simulation platforms that can be used for skills assessment and training. Challenges include simulator types and access, as well as structured mentoring and feedback. Robotic simulation training curricula have not been standardized. Simulation includes one primary technology, which can be prohibitive based on cost and requirements for onboarding.

conclusionsWhile surgical simulation seems to be a fundamental and integrated part of surgical training, it requires a significant number of resources, which can be daunting for residency training programs. Regardless of the barriers outlined, the need for surgical simulation in laparoscopy, endoscopy, and robotics at surgical education training programs is clear.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCurriculumInternship and ResidencySimulation TrainingEndoscopyGeneral SurgeryHumansLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresCompetency trainingEndoscopyLaparoscopyResidency trainingRobotic surgerySimulation training

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.