ArticleScientific reports2024
A better performing algorithm for identification of implausible growth data from longitudinal pediatric medical records.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- GLP-1R Gene Polymorphisms and Metabolic Traits During Childhood and Adolescence: The EPOCH Study.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
- GLP-1R Polymorphisms Modify the Relationship Between Exposure to Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Offspring BMI Growth: The EPOCH Study.Diabetes care · 2025Article
- Association of childhood-adulthood body size trajectories with risk of micro- and macrovascular complications among individuals with type 2 diabetes: a prospective study.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tracking trajectories of body size in children provides insight into chronic disease risk. One measure of pediatric body size is body mass index (BMI), a function of height and weight. Errors in measuring height or weight may lead to incorrect assessment of BMI. Yet childhood measures of height and weight extracted from electronic medical records often include values which seem biologically implausible in the context of a growth trajectory. Removing biologically implausible values reduces noise in the data, and thus increases the ease of modeling associations between exposures and childhood BMI trajectories, or between childhood BMI trajectories and subsequent health conditions. We developed open-source algorithms (available on github) for detecting and removing biologically implausible values in pediatric trajectories of height and weight. A Monte Carlo simulation experiment compared the sensitivity, specificity and speed of our algorithms to three published algorithms. The comparator algorithms were selected because they used trajectory information, had open-source code, and had published verification studies. Simulation inputs were derived from longitudinal epidemiological cohorts. Our algorithms had higher specificity, with similar sensitivity and speed, when compared to the three published algorithms. The results suggest that our algorithms should be adopted for cleaning longitudinal pediatric growth data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.