ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2024
Could light be a broad-spectrum antimicrobial?
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blue light activated nitrogen doped poly floral carbon quantum dots: multifunctional agent for anti-microbial and anti-cancer photodynamic therapy.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026Article
- An in vitro comparison of cold atmospheric plasma and methylene blue-mediated antimicrobial photodynamic therapy with 660 nm laser on Streptococcus mutans biofilms.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Inactivation of Microorganisms by a Blue Laser (445 nm)-An In Vitro Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Emerging Challenges inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Photodynamic Inactivation of Bacteria in Boar Semen with Blue LED Light.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Significance of Multidisciplinary Teams for Patients with Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical Diseases: An Observational Retrospective Study in a General Hospital in China.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
designA review on antimicrobial resistance mechanisms discussing the main light-based antimicrobial approaches including ultraviolet light (UV), antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT), and antimicrobial blue light (aBL).
aimTo describe antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and to present potential light-based alternatives to conventional antimicrobials.
methodsThe paper was divided into different topics, starting with an approach to antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. Subsequently, emphasis was placed on innovative light-based antimicrobials approaches, including aBL, UV, and aPDT.
resultsThe review suggests that blue light (400-470 nm) acts on endogenous porphyrins with peak absorption at 405 nm, thus not requiring the administration of photosensitizers, to trigger antimicrobial effects. In this regarding, the direct effect of aBL could be attributed to both the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which induces microbicidal effects, and the inactivation of bacterial defense mechanisms. In turn, blue light combined with curcumin has been used in the treatment of dental infections. Otherwise, green light (495-570 nm) associated with the photosensitizer Rose Bengal has shown promising results both in wound closure due to the induction of additional collagen cross-link formation and in reducing the viability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Red light (620-750 nm) is the wavelength most commonly used in aPDT, presenting superior tissue penetration capability compared to blue and green light. Both red and infrared light act directly as photobiomodulation agents, promoting tissue repair with greater penetration depth for the infrared spectrum. Conversely, red light combined with methylene blue is the most commonly used technique in the treatment of localized infections. Meanwhile, infrared light associated with indocyanine green acts as a photothermal and photosensitizing agent, promoting thermal damage and production of ROS. Ultraviolet lights UVA, UVB, and UVC (200-400 nm) have antimicrobial potential related to inducing changes in DNA and generating both ROS and singlet oxygen. Furthermore, light can enhance the efficacy of traditional antimicrobial agents by deactivating microbial resistance, both through increasing the permeability of the cell membrane and by inhibiting the efflux pump and β-lactamases of the bacteria.
conclusionsThe antimicrobial potential of light is extensive; however, there is a limitation regarding the depth of penetration of certain wavelengths into infected areas. Furthermore, there is a need for additional studies to determine the safety and efficacy of various approaches using light at its different wavelengths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39107461What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.