ArticleScientific reports2024
Grasshopper platform-assisted design optimization of fujian rural earthen buildings considering low-carbon emissions reduction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-objective optimal research on low-energy dwellings design based on genetic algorithm in Qinba mountain region, China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work aims to explore optimization methods for the design of earthen buildings in rural Fujian to achieve low-carbon emissions and improve the structural stability of earthen buildings. First, parametric modeling and optimization algorithms are employed through the Grasshopper platform. An intelligent earthen building design is created by combining the optimization of factors such as the structure of earthen buildings, building materials, and orientation. Then, a comparison is made with the unoptimized, energy-efficient, and carbon emission reduction designs. Finally, the work concludes that the proposed design significantly optimizes the total carbon emissions, energy consumption, structural stability, and economic aspects. The proposed design scheme achieves the highest carbon emission reduction effect, with a reduction rate of 34.64%. The proposed design exhibits lower maximum stress and higher minimum safety factor in terms of structural stability compared to other scenarios, along with smaller structural displacement. It also performs well in terms of initial investment, annual operating costs, and construction period. The significance of this work lies in providing scientific guidance for the design and construction of rural earthen buildings, promoting the organic integration of rural development with low-carbon initiatives. This indicates that the use of intelligent optimization methods for earthen building design is feasible and can yield positive results in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.