ArticleScientific reports2024
Early monitoring of inlay wear after total knee arthroplasty on plain radiographs using model-based wear measurement.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wear of the ultra-high molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) component in total knee arthroplasty contributes to implant failure. It is often detected late, when patients experience pain or instability. Early monitoring could enable timely intervention, preventing implant failure and joint degeneration. This study investigates the accuracy and precision (repeatability) of model-based wear measurement (MBWM), a novel technique that can estimate inlay thickness and wear radiographically. Six inlays were milled from non-crosslinked UHMWPE and imaged via X-ray in anteroposterior view at flexion angles 0°, 30°, and 60° on a phantom knee model. MBWM measurements were compared with reference values from a coordinate measurement machine. Three inlays were subjected to accelerated wear generation and similarly evaluated. MBWM estimated inlay thickness with medial and lateral accuracies of 0.13 ± 0.09 and 0.14 ± 0.09 mm, respectively, and linear wear with an accuracy of 0.07 ± 0.06 mm. Thickness measurements revealed significant lateral differences at 0° and 30° (0.22 ± 0.08 mm vs. 0.06 ± 0.06 mm, respectively; t-test, p = 0.0002). Precision was high, with average medial and lateral differences of - 0.01 ± 0.04 mm between double experiments. MBWM using plain radiographs presents a practical and promising approach for the clinical detection of implant wear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.