ArticleScientific reports2024
Annual trends in atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome management in Japan and factors influencing early diagnosis and treatment: a retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Therapeutic advances in eculizumab for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a narrative review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Research Gaps and Priorities for aHUS in the Gulf Cooperation Countries (GCC): Findings from a Payer-Focused Expert Meeting.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026Article
- Characteristics and clinical courses of patients with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome on dialysis withdrawal after eculizumab treatment: sub-analysis of post-marketing surveillance in Japan.Journal of nephrology · 2025Article
- Real-World effectiveness of eculizumab in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a retrospective study from Western China.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Terminal complement inhibition in atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome: a single-centre experience.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare disorder characterised by complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Despite clinical guidelines, the diagnosis and treatment of aHUS in its early stages remains challenging. This study examined the annual trends in aHUS clinical practices in Japan and explored factors influencing early diagnosis and treatment. Using data from the 2011-2020 Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, 3096 cases with the HUS disease code were identified, of which 217 were confirmed as aHUS and treated with eculizumab or plasma exchange. Early initiation, defined as starting eculizumab or plasma exchange within 7 days of admission, was the focus of the study. Our study revealed no significant changes over time in the number of aHUS diagnoses, cases treated with eculizumab, or early initiation cases. Early initiation cases underwent haemodialysis earlier and had ADAMTS13 activity measured earlier, shorter hospital stays, and lower hospitalisation costs than late initiation cases. In conclusion, we found no increase in the number of newly diagnosed aHUS cases or early treatment initiation over time. Early recognition of TMA and differentiation of the causative disease are crucial for identifying potential aHUS cases, which may lead to better patient prognoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.