Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39107392›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Prediction and analysis of dominant factors influencing moisture content during vacuum screening based on machine learning.

Ling Nie, Weiguo Ma, Xiangdong Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ling NieSchool of Computer Science, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, 434000, Hubei, China.
Weiguo MaSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, 434000, Hubei, China. mwg-jh@yangtzeu.edu.cn.
Xiangdong XieSchool of Urban Construction, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, 434000, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of the dominant factors influencing moisture content is essential for investigating vacuum filtration mechanisms. In view of the present situation where there is insufficient experimental data and the dominant factors influencing the moisture content of a filter cake have not been identified, in this study a vacuum filtration apparatus was designed and constructed. Quartz sand particles were used as the filtration material. 300 datasets of moisture contents of a filter cake were obtained under different experimental conditions. Multiple Linear Regression, artificial neural network, decision tree, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting were used to establish a prediction model for moisture content during vacuum screening. By comprehensively analyzing the feature importance rankings and the effects of positive and negative correlations, the dominant factors influencing the moisture content of the filter cake during vacuum screening were the particle ratio, screen mesh, and airflow rate. This finding not only provides a scientific basis for the optimization of vacuum screening technology but also points the way for improving screening efficiency in practical applications. It is of significant importance for deepening the understanding of the vacuum screening mechanism and promoting its extensive application.

Indexed as

Dominant factorsMoisture contentPrediction modelsVacuum screening

Identifiers

PMID39107392
PMCPMC11303776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.