ArticleScientific reports2024
Demonstration that sublinear dendrites enable linearly non-separable computations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frequency-dependent coupling in response to oscillatory inputs in minimal networks of electrically coupled nodes: Gap junction networks and spatially extended neurons.Biological cybernetics · 2026Article
- MASCAF: A Cable Model Fitting Pipeline for Topologically Complex Surface Meshes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Flexible integration of natural stimuli by auditory cortical neurons.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Synaptic integration and competition in the substantia nigra pars reticulata-An experimental and in silico analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Demonstration that sublinear dendrites enable linearly non-separable computations.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Theory predicts that nonlinear summation of synaptic potentials within dendrites allows neurons to perform linearly non-separable computations (LNSCs). Using Boolean analysis approaches, we predicted that both supralinear and sublinear synaptic summation could allow single neurons to implement a type of LNSC, the feature binding problem (FBP), which does not require inhibition contrary to the exclusive-or function (XOR). Notably, sublinear dendritic operations enable LNSCs when scattered synaptic activation generates increased somatic spike output. However, experimental demonstrations of scatter-sensitive neuronal computations have not yet been described. Using glutamate uncaging onto cerebellar molecular layer interneurons, we show that scattered synaptic-like activation of dendrites evoked larger compound EPSPs than clustered synaptic activation, generating a higher output spiking probability. Moreover, we also demonstrate that single interneurons can indeed implement the FBP. Using a biophysical model to explore the conditions in which a neuron might be expected to implement the FBP, we establish that sublinear summation is necessary but not sufficient. Other parameters such as the relative sublinearity, the EPSP size, depolarization amplitude relative to action potential threshold, and voltage fluctuations all influence whether the FBP can be performed. Since sublinear synaptic summation is a property of passive dendrites, we expect that many different neuron types can implement LNSCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.