ArticleScientific reports2024
A Reinforcement Learning approach to study climbing plant behaviour.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in plant salt stress research: from predictive models to multi-omics integration.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- When two become one: perceptual completion in pea plants.Plant signaling & behavior · 2025Article
- Do strigolactones play a role in the ascent and attachment behavior ofPlant signaling & behavior · 2025Article
- Accelerating crop improvement via integration of transcriptome-based network biology and genome editing.Planta · 2025Review
- AI-driven advances in plant biotechnology: sharpening the edge of plant tissue culture and genome editing.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A plant's structure is the result of constant adaptation and evolution to the surrounding environment. From this perspective, our goal is to investigate the mass and radius distribution of a particular plant organ, namely the searcher shoot, by providing a Reinforcement Learning (RL) environment, that we call Searcher-Shoot, which considers the mechanics due to the mass of the shoot and leaves. We uphold the hypothesis that plants maximize their length, avoiding a maximal stress threshold. To do this, we explore whether the mass distribution along the stem is efficient, formulating a Markov Decision Process. By exploiting this strategy, we are able to mimic and thus study the plant's behavior, finding that shoots decrease their diameters smoothly, resulting in an efficient distribution of the mass. The strong accordance between our results and the experimental data allows us to remark on the strength of our approach in the analysis of biological systems traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.