Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39107329›Full record

ArticleNPJ vaccines2024

Immunisation of koalas against Chlamydia pecorum results in significant protection against chlamydial disease and mortality.

Samuel Phillips, Jon Hanger, Julien Grosmaire, Ahmed Mehdi, Martina Jelocnik, Jessie Wong, Peter Timms

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Current status and future directions ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dominance of Vaccine-SpecificEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  6. Epidemiology, Transmission Mode, and Pathogenesis ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel PhillipsCentre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia. sphilli2@usc.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2549-8111
Jon HangerEndeavour Veterinary Ecology, Toorbul, Queensland, Australia.
Julien GrosmaireEndeavour Veterinary Ecology, Toorbul, Queensland, Australia.
Ahmed MehdiQueensland Cyber Infrastructure Foundation (QCIF), Facility for Advanced Bioinformatics, St Lucia, Australia.
Martina JelocnikCentre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia.
Jessie WongCentre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia.
Peter TimmsCentre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1682-0025

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2022, the Australian Government listed the koala as endangered in several states due to habitat destruction, traffic strikes, dog attacks, and Chlamydia pecorum disease. This study evaluates a 10-year assessment of a Major Outer Membrane Protein-based vaccine's effectiveness against chlamydial disease in wild koalas from Southeast Queensland. Over a decade, 680 koalas were tracked, with five vaccine trials involving 165 koalas. While prior studies only offered up to two years of data, this study's extended period allowed a thorough evaluation of vaccine efficacy. Results showed that vaccinated koalas had significantly lower disease incidence, with a 64% reduction in chlamydial mortality. This vaccine demonstrated positive impacts on both male and female koalas, highlighting its crucial role in conserving the Australian koala population and mitigating the threats they face.

Identifiers

PMID39107329
PMCPMC11303382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.