ArticleNPJ science of learning2024
A systematic review of AI literacy scales.
Article in NPJ science of learning, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of the AI mental health Therapy Attitude, Perception, and Intention Scale (AiTAPI).Internet interventions · 2026Article
- A Multidimensional Analysis of AI Literacy Determinants: External Resources, Digital Skills, and Psychological Profile Among University Students.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Scale for AI Literacy in Health Care Workers: Development and Validation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence literacy, rather than artificial intelligence anxiety, is associated with career optimism in physiotherapy and rehabilitation students: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Profiles of artificial intelligence literacy and associations with evidence-based practice competence among nurses: a latent profile analysis.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Measuring eHealth Literacy in the European Economic Area, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- "In ChatGPT-Powered Virtual Influencers We (Dis)Trust?": The Privacy Paradox and the Double-Edged Sword of Ubiquitous Large Language Model (LLM) Generative AI as a General Purpose Technology (GPT) in a Human-Centered AI Ecosystem.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bias, representation, and clinical fidelity in AI-generated images for medical education: a systematic literature review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an AI use scale for sport and exercise science students.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Medicine digital transformation: evidence from Chinese physicians on generative artificial intelligence implementation and challenges.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Cognitive capability and behavioral exposure in generative AI use: a dual-pathway model of perceived facilitation and integrity-related risk.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in higher education: use and appropriation of tools by university students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Development and psychometric evaluation of the AI emotional engagement scale.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- How does artificial intelligence improve ophthalmology education outcomes?-The mediating role of learning motivation and self-efficacy.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- AI and algorithmic literacy among health workers: a scoping review through a digital health literacy lens.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Artificial and emotional intelligence: two key forces for teachers' professional development in an era of uncertainty.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence literacy in Somali education: balancing opportunities, risks, and policy directions.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence literacy, anxiety, and attitudes among registered nurses across different hospital tiers: a multi-center cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A conceptual analysis: generative artificial intelligence literacy in English as a foreign language writing.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Can co-designed educational interventions help consumers think critically about asking ChatGPT health questions? Results from a randomised-controlled trial.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the opportunities and challenges stemming from the artificial intelligence developments and its integration into society, AI literacy becomes a key concern. Utilizing quality AI literacy instruments is crucial for understanding and promoting AI literacy development. This systematic review assessed the quality of AI literacy scales using the COSMIN tool aiming to aid researchers in choosing instruments for AI literacy assessment. This review identified 22 studies validating 16 scales targeting various populations including general population, higher education students, secondary education students, and teachers. Overall, the scales demonstrated good structural validity and internal consistency. On the other hand, only a few have been tested for content validity, reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness. None of the scales have been tested for cross-cultural validity and measurement error. Most studies did not report any interpretability indicators and almost none had raw data available. There are 3 performance-based scale available, compared to 13 self-report scales.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.