Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39107059›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Neurons of Macaque Frontal Eye Field Signal Reward-Related Surprise.

Michael R Shteyn, Carl R Olson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael R ShteynNeuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 colson@cnbc.cmu.edu mshteyn@andrew.cmu.edu.
Carl R OlsonNeuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 colson@cnbc.cmu.edu mshteyn@andrew.cmu.edu.

Funding

Virus Production and Manipulation of Protein/Gene Expression ModuleP30EY008098 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Ethan A Rossi · 1989 to 2026
$17.8M
Interdisciplinary Visual Sciences (IVS) Traininig ProgramT32EY017271 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Marlene Behrmann, Paul R. Kinchington · 2008 to 2026
$3.6M
REPRESENTATION OF FAMILIAR IMAGES IN VENTRAL STREAM VISUAL CORTEXR01EY030226 · NEI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, TAI-SING, OLSON, CARL ROGER · 2020 to 2022
$1.3M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008098NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030226NEI NIH HHS T32 EY017271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The frontal eye field (FEF) plays a well-established role in the control of visual attention. The strength of an FEF neuron's response to a visual stimulus presented in its receptive field is enhanced if the stimulus captures spatial attention by virtue of its salience. A stimulus can be rendered salient by cognitive factors as well as by physical attributes. These include surprise. The aim of the present experiment was to determine whether surprise-induced salience would result in enhanced visual-response strength in the FEF. Toward this end, we monitored neuronal activity in two male monkeys while presenting first a visual cue predicting with high probability that the reward delivered at the end of the trial would be good or bad (large or small) and then a visual cue announcing the size of the impending reward with certainty. The second cue usually confirmed but occasionally violated the expectation set up by the first cue. Neurons responded more strongly to the second cue when it violated than when it confirmed expectation. The increase in the firing rate was accompanied by a decrease in spike-count correlation as expected from capture of attention. Although both good surprise and bad surprise induced enhanced firing, the effects appeared to arise from distinct mechanisms as indicated by the fact that the bad-surprise signal appeared at a longer latency than the good-surprise signal and by the fact that the strength of the two signals varied independently across neurons.

Indexed as

AttentionCuesMacaca mulattaNeuronsPhotic StimulationRewardVisual FieldsAction PotentialsAnimalsFrontal LobeMaleReaction TimeVisual PerceptionattentionFEFfrontal eye fieldmacaquerewardsurprise

Identifiers

PMID39107059
PMCPMC11411596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.