ArticleBMJ open2024
Optimal approach to ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum blocks for postoperative analgesia in elective caesarean section: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUltrasound-guided quadratus lumborum blocks are commonly used for postoperative analgesia during caesarean section. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum blocks can be performed through four approaches, including lateral, posterior, anterior, and intramuscular quadratus lumborum blocks. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the optimal approach to ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum blocks for postoperative analgesia in elective caesarean section. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases will be systematically searched from their inception to 30 July 2024. Randomised controlled trials that compared the analgesic effects of different ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block approaches in elective caesarean section will be included. Only publications in English will be eligible for inclusion. The total postoperative analgesic consumption over 24 hours will be the primary outcome. The time to first analgesic request, postoperative pain scores at rest and during movement, and incidence of adverse effects will be secondary outcomes. RevMan V.5.4 will be used for the statistical analysis. Network meta-analysis will be used for indirect comparisons between different approaches across studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to assess the quality of evidence for each outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was not required. The results of this study will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024503694.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.