Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39107022›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Evaluating the impact of a ward environment with 20 single occupancy rooms and two four-bedded bays on patient and staff experiences and outcomes in an acute NHS Trust: a mixed-methods study protocol.

Yetunde Ataiyero, Emma Stimpson, Helen Hall, Helen Ashby, Alisen Dube, Vanda Carter, Hazel A Smith, Al Ross, Jacky Copping, Paul Morris and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yetunde AtaiyeroCentre for Health Innovation, School of Health, Education, Policing and Sciences, Staffordshire University, Stafford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3398-976X
Emma StimpsonJames Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Great Yarmouth, UK.
Helen HallJames Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Great Yarmouth, UK.
Helen AshbyJames Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Great Yarmouth, UK.
Alisen DubeCentre for Health Innovation, School of Health, Education, Policing and Sciences, Staffordshire University, Stafford, UK.
Vanda CarterCentre for Health Innovation, School of Health, Education, Policing and Sciences, Staffordshire University, Stafford, UK.
Hazel A SmithCentre for Health Innovation, School of Health, Education, Policing and Sciences, Staffordshire University, Stafford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5538-0897
Al RossCentre for Health Innovation, School of Health, Education, Policing and Sciences, Staffordshire University, Stafford, UK.
Jacky CoppingJames Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Great Yarmouth, UK.
Paul MorrisJames Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Great Yarmouth, UK.
Sarahjane JonesCentre for Health Innovation, School of Health, Education, Policing and Sciences, Staffordshire University, Stafford, UK sarahjane.jones@staffs.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTraditionally, wards in acute care hospitals consist predominately of multioccupancy bays with some single rooms. There is an increasing global trend towards a higher proportion of single rooms in hospitals, with the UK National Health Service (NHS) advocating for single-room provision in all new hospital builds. There is limited evidence on the impact of a ward environment incorporating mostly single and some multioccupancy bays on patient care and organisational outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSES: This study will assess the impact of a newly designed 28-bedded ward environment, with 20 single rooms and two four-bedded bays, on patient and staff experiences and outcomes in an acute NHS Trust in East England. The study is divided into two work packages (WP)-WP1 is a quantitative data extraction of routinely collected patient and staff data while WP2 is a mixed-methods process evaluation consisting of one-to-one, in-depth, semistructured interviews with staff, qualitative observations of work processes on the ward and a quantitative data evaluation of routinely collected process evaluation data from patients and staff. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the UK Health Research Authority (IRAS ID: 334395). Study findings will be shared with key stakeholders, published in peer-reviewed high-impact journals and presented at relevant conferences.

Indexed as

Patients' RoomsState MedicineBed OccupancyEnglandHospital Design and ConstructionHumansPatient SatisfactionResearch DesignUnited KingdomBed OccupancyPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionWork Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID39107022
PMCPMC11308872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.